My Troubles With Word-press Subjects
| Team info | |
| Description | It all started in the late 90's. I needed to place some news on my internet site. A journal. A summary of forthcoming events. I began with basic HTML. One page, with areas for each post. Simple. Then I learned about 'websites' and 'blogging.' Being smart, I picked Wordpress, the most used computer software. In the event you desire to be taught more on FIQL.com - The Best Source for Music and Video Playlists, we recommend millions of resources people can pursue. Click here PureVolume™ | We're Listening To You to read where to acknowledge it. How smart, I thought. In the event that you have the WYSIWYG editor going, anybody can set up a web site. Very democratic. This prompted my to post my outermost thoughts; o-n politics, London, and personal gripes. Being a web-master, I watched to see Google index them. 'Here we go', I thought, 'quickly, my gems of extrospection can belong to the ages.' Except Google did not like my weblog. It would maybe not index much beyond the leading page. Why, why, why? Replicate material? I set it to put only one post per-page. No progress. I checked out what Google was indexing. Then I checked out the blog HTML. Shortly, all became clear. In sum: - Word-press was still saying my content, and - It'd no right META-TAGS, and - There was a lot unnecessary HTML, and - The structure obscured the content. I'd a fast search o-n Google to get search engine marketing ideas. There's a plug-in 'head-meta description' ( http://guff.szub.net/plugins/ ). But I did not use that, oh no. For whatever reason, I got the notion a complete design will be the ticket. I tried modifying an existing one myself. Better, although not great. Google was beginning to catalog more pages, but they all had exactly the same name. My missives to an uncaring world were being overlooked. So I got another person to do one, based on my requirements, which were: - Grab a META 'name' from your article 'title'; - Grab a META 'explanation' from your blog 'excerpts'; - Put a ROBOTS 'noindex' label in non-content pages. But that wasn't enough. For best SEO results you should change Word-press extremely. You've to become _mean_ to it. You've to _man_ enough. I did so a little of re-search and created to following tips. I learned about Linkliciousmeaffiliateregret's blog – Search for Borders Book Store Coupon | Genius by searching books in the library. WARNING: They're extreme. Making major changes to your URLs might affect them, In the event that you curently have good ratings. In my case: - Moving my weblog http://www.ttblog.co.uk for the root web service, - MOD_REWRITING its URLs, and - Removing a 30-1 redirect, ... caused my PageRank to go to 0. BUT, page indexing was unchanged. This is temporary, as Google saw it as 'suspect' conduct. I'd significantly changed my site. Here are the guidelines, for real _men_, who is able to try the face area of internet death and laugh: 1. Activate permalinks by visiting 'Options/Permalinks.' You may have to enable Apache MOD_REWRITE on your web consideration. 1a. Reduce the rule to just the %postname% variable. Don't work with the date codes. This keeps your URLs small. 2. Position your site in the uppermost directory possible. http://www.ttblog.co.uk is better than http://www.ttblog.co.uk/wordpress/ Therefore a normal post would seem like http://www.ttblog.co.uk/Im-hard-as-nails-me/ Instead of http://www.ttblog.co.uk/wordpress/2006/08/03/Im-hard-as-nails-me/ 3. Then install an SEO'd theme. My websites are now indexed beautifully. The Google 'site:' command returns all my posts, and little else. For my next concern, I turn it into an operating-system, and take on Windows XP.. |
| Web site | http://www.fiql.com/groups/complete.php?groupName=stock_indexes_the_within_story |
| Total credit | 0 |
| Recent average credit | 0 |
| Cross-project stats | SETIBZH BOINCstats.com Free-DC |
| Country | None |
| Type | Government agency |
| Members | |
| Founder | |
| New members in last day | 0 |
| Total members | 0 (view) |
| Active members | 0 (view) |
| Members with credit | 0 (view) |