Tasers And Non-Lethal Stun Weapons EMDT
| Team info | |
| Description | Tasers Versus Stun Guns: Most people make use of the phrases 'Taser' and 'Stun Gun' interchangeably. The difference between the two is a lot more than the fact this one (Taser) shoots electrical probes, and the other (Stun Gun) works on contact. The technology used by each is unique and as it might be described a Taser is not just a Stun Gun on a String. First, let me shortly rehash the physical differences. A Stun Gun is a contact w... Electro-Muscular Trouble (EMD) Technology Tasers Versus Stun Guns: Many people use the terms 'Taser' and 'Stun Gun' interchangeably. The difference between both is more than the actual fact that certain (Taser) launches electric probes, and another (Stun Gun) works on contact. The technology utilized by each is unique and a Taser is not merely a Stun Gun on the String because it might be described. First, allow me to shortly rehash the physical differences. A Stun Gun is a contact system where the electrical probes should be actually touched to your attacker's human body. It works on a relatively simple rule by which some method is required to have a really low input voltage (like a basic 9-volt battery), and significantly grow it to produce a remarkable output voltage (while keeping the amperage output well below lethal levels). You can read about the different options for achieving this on my web site (http://www.snjselfdefense.com/stunmaster.htm), Wikipedia, or even a number of other self-defense websites on the Net. Browse here at right pepper spray for sale to read why to look at it. The Taser on-the other hand, can be a stand-off weapon that shoots electrical probes which must attach to the attackers clothing or skin. Tasers utilize what's generally known as Electro-Muscular Disruption Technology (EMDT) as well as a voltage step-up approach. It's the EMDT that offers a Taser such outstanding takedown energy with only a (comparatively) small voltage output. Though almost all Tasers possess a contact Stun Gun constructed into them in case of a skip, a misfire, or the adversary is already too near to fire within the stand-off method, a Stun Gun does not, simply mentioned, a Taser limbs. Stun Guns themselves are very successful both as deterrents and in actual use. My pastor discovered read outstanding pepper spray for sale by browsing Bing. It has been my experience that normal people are just like afraid of the 80,000 volt Talon Mini while they are of the 975,000 volt Lithium Hot Shot. Just initiating the stun gun to get a.1 second demonstration scares the pants from most anybody. The issue is that 'normal people' are not the ones out there raping, mugging, and purse snatching; therefore the extreme voltage necessary to ensure ending some massive, muscle bound fan case jacked up o-n Crystal Meth or PCP. Tony Montana soaking up round after round of small arms fire while 'launching his little friend' is a bit of a stretch however not that much of one, to get a drug unhealthy madman. A stun gun's success increases with the quantity of time it remains in contact with the attacker. Therefore much electrical energy is dumped in-to an attacker's human body, that neuromuscular connections are inundated. This causes the muscles to do an incredible amount of work almost instantly, causing a rapid build up of lactic acid making the enemy not capable of controlling voluntary muscle movement. The most useful example I can think about (that I'm knowledgeable about) is how we use jamming to confuse and weaken the enemy's radar and communications in aerial combat. Communications jamming: The purpose of both kinds of non-lethal stun tools is to 'jam' the electrical communications between your brain and muscles. If we view it in terms of the ap-plication of communications blocking, the example fits quite nicely. Noise jamming or region jamming is done when trying to deny an entire range for example say, VHF frequencies. A higher powered signal is sent since the whole fre-quency range with undecipherable noise. It is quite effective and all you could hear o-n the air is frustrating noise. The strategy to overcome noise jamming would be to 'out energy' it, or in functional terms: A really strong, extremely aimed single frequency signal can break-through the noise. A Stun Gun runs on a primary. An enormous amount of energy (voltage) in-the 14-17 Watt range, blocks out and confuses the body's electrical signals from your mind to the muscles, and overcomes them. Several facets such as for example pain tolerance, psychological emphasis, human body salinity, musculature and others, determine the total amount of power required to entirely overcome the neuromuscular system. That is why you hear 'strange but true' stories of whacked out, medicine crazy, maniacally aimed people battling through the stun gun's consequences for longer than seems humanly possible. No one can fight it down for long, but it is difficult to keep constant probe contact with a wildly flailing adversary. Pinpoint jamming: One way to significantly increase performing effectiveness is to determine a specific fre-quency or very narrow band of wavelengths. Less energy out is required and some very interesting things can be achieved such as mimicking or manipulating a specific frequency for your own purposes. This is actually the the specified end result of Electro-Muscular Disruption Technology, and the reason why a Taser is really effective using a voltage output of only 50,000 volts. There are several means of influencing and refining the targeted neuromuscular connection frequency band. For a second way of interpreting this, please check out: the infographic. Generally, varying the voltage waveform or the Joule energy production are-the most often used. So far as I could tell, Taser and Stinger International are on the leading edge of those new developments. There is a fantastic test evaluation movie as you are able to find on the Internet get searching for 'Stinger Versus Taser Video' on any major se. The test was done by a completely independent outfit named CRT, and (only for full disclosure) backed by Taser International. You can judge the results for yourself (I am by nature skeptical of everything), but the something that is distinguished, is the immediate performance of the Taser. The electrical 'performing' productivity through the M-18 Taser brings, is in the specific 18-26 Watt variety. I-t essentially changes the neuromuscular link and requires the muscles to complete contraction. The subjects of the aforementioned research, over repeatedly make reference to the sensation as being immediately, and completely 'locked up', the fact which is obviously shown in the video. Discover further on an affiliated wiki - Hit this web site: company web site. There is almost no time dependence on the Taser to 'build up' success. The devastating effects are immediate and last as long as energy will be applied. There are advantages and drawbacks to both Stun Guns and Tasers, the principal of which is price. You can aquire a simple 80-100,000 volt stun gun for about 20-to 25 dollars with powerful lithium battery designs running upwards of 75 to 80 dollars each. Tasers on the other hand, are in the hundreds of dollars range. You're planning to need to buy that leading edge technology! Two other obvious benefits of the Taser are stand-off capability and instant limiting power. While a cheaper Stun Gun is very good for stunning the crap out of an assailant and getting out of the target area correctly, police forces use the Taser to subdue violent topics quickly. I hope that explanation makes sense. I welcome comments and suggestions from those with extensive experience in this region.. |
| Web site | http://www.hightechsafety.com/pepper-sprays.html |
| Total credit | 0 |
| Recent average credit | 0 |
| Cross-project stats | BOINCstats.com SETIBZH Free-DC |
| Country | United States |
| Type | University or department |
| Members | |
| Founder | exezrupogfxu |
| New members in last day | 0 |
| Total members | 0 (view) |
| Active members | 0 (view) |
| Members with credit | 0 (view) |